Effect of silica nanoparticles on the curing kinetics and erosion wear of an epoxy powder coating
Journal of Materials Research and Technology, ISSN: 2238-7854, Vol: 9, Issue: 1, Page: 455-464
2020
- 28Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this study, the wear resistance of an epoxy powder coating was improved by SiO 2 nanoparticles and their possible effect on curing kinetics of the coating was also evaluated. The epoxy powder coating was prepared with different percentages of nanoparticles (1-3 by wt.%) using a hot mixer, a method that can be more economic than other ones. The particle size distribution and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) of epoxy powder were evaluated to examine the effect of mixing on the powder. The effect of SiO 2 on the curing of epoxy powder was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The Kissinger and model free kinetics (MFK) methods were used to calculate the activation energy (E a ) of the curing process of powders. The coating spraying process was carried out in an industrial installation on carbon steel substrates. The glass transition temperature (T g ) of the coatings was also studied using DSC. The morphology of the cured organic coatings was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Stiffness and hardness Vickers (HV) were evaluated. A test based on ASTM D969 was developed to perform erosion measurements. The results obtained by both the Kissinger and MKF methods showed that nanoparticles do not influence significantly the E a of curing of the coatings. The addition of 1% SiO 2 improves the erosion wear at 45 and 60°, due to the increase in stiffness and hardness provided by the nanoparticles, though, when particles collide at 60° with the samples, the lowest thickness loss was found for the epoxy with 3% nanoreinforcements.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785419304107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.073; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076573467&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2238785419304107; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2238785419304107?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2238785419304107?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.073
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know