On two collateral effects of using algorithm visualizations
British Journal of Educational Technology, ISSN: 0007-1013, Vol: 42, Issue: 6, Page: E145-E147
2011
- 2Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A number of researchers conducted a study to demonstrate collateral effects of using algorithm visualizations (AV). An experiment was performed to evaluate the difference in efficacy of using AVs in individual and collaborative learning situations. Some students of the first year of an undergraduate program in computer science were asked to participate in an experiment oriented towards validating the following hypothesis at the end of a course on algorithms and data structures. The rational behind this hypothesis was The rational behind this hypothesis compensated by the collaboration between students, while this was not true in the case of individual learning. The first result was that the students who had access to AVs independently of the learning environment, performed worse than the other students while dealing with theoretical questions concerning the visualized algorithm.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80054973497&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01220.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01220.x; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01220.x/fullpdf; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8535.2011.01220.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know