Evaluation of e-healthy diet literacy and food consumption in people who have or have not received nutrition counseling
Nutrition and Health, ISSN: 2047-945X, Page: 2601060251323954
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Aim: This study explores the relationship between e-healthy diet literacy and food consumption in individuals receiving nutrition counseling. Methods: Data were collected from 750 participants using a questionnaire covering socio-demographics, anthropometric data, food consumption habits, and the e-Healthy Diet Literacy Questionnaire (e-HDLQ). Results: Results showed that individuals receiving nutrition counseling had significantly higher total e-HDLQ scores and sub-factor scores for “Finding e-Healthy Diet Information (e-HDIF),” “Judging e-Healthy Diet Information (e-HDIJ),” and “Applying e-Healthy Diet Information (e-HDIA)” compared to those not receiving counseling (p < 0.01). Additionally, participants who consumed fresh fruits and vegetables had significantly higher “e-HDIJ” scores compared to non-consumers. Similarly, those who consumed sugar had higher “e-HDIJ” scores than those who avoided sugar (p < 0.01). This suggests that consuming fresh produce and sugar may positively impact the ability to evaluate dietary information. Interestingly, individuals who avoided bread and cereals scored significantly higher in the “e-HDIA” sub-factor than those who consumed these foods (p < 0.01). This indicates that abstaining from bread and grains may enhance the ability to apply dietary knowledge. Conclusion: In conclusion, the findings highlight the significant impact of nutrition counseling on digital diet literacy and suggest that dietary habits, such as consuming fresh produce, sugar, or avoiding bread and cereals, play an important role in shaping e-healthy diet literacy. These results offer valuable insights into improving dietary education and behavior in diverse populations.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know