El diseño de ambientes Blended-Learning, retos y oportunidades
Educación y Educadores, ISSN: 0123-1294, Vol: 23, Issue: 4, Page: 659-682
2021
- 13Citations
- 75Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- CrossRef13
- Captures75
- Readers75
- 75
Article Description
Resumen En la era de la información y el conocimiento, resulta innegable la importancia de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en los escenarios educativos. Los entornos de aprendizaje mixto o Blended-Learning ofrecen al profesor una amplia gama de mediaciones para el aprendizaje; sin embargo, se requiere avanzar en la construcción de criterios didácticos y tecnológicos para su diseño. Basados en el método de revisión sistemática de la literatura (RSL), este estudio documental analiza un grupo de 43 investigaciones sobre la modalidad b-Learning en el ámbito educativo, las cuales revelan sus alcances y retos. Los hallazgos muestran que los aspectos más relevantes para incursionar en el diseño didáctico de experiencias b-Learning son la evaluación, el trabajo colaborativo y las mediaciones tecnológicas.
Bibliographic Details
https://educacionyeducadores.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/eye/article/view/13901; http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/edu.2020.23.4.6; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-12942020000400659&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0123-12942020000400659&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-12942020000400659; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0123-12942020000400659; https://dx.doi.org/10.5294/edu.2020.23.4.6
Universidad de la Sabana
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know