Perceptions of diabetic retinopathy and screening procedures among diabetic people
Diabetic Medicine, ISSN: 0742-3071, Vol: 19, Issue: 10, Page: 810-813
2002
- 30Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes29
- 29
- CrossRef25
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures49
- Readers49
- 41
Article Description
Aims: To assess how diabetic patients perceive retinopathy, screening for sight-threatening lesions and their own role in preventing blindness. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 258 consecutive patients after screening for retinopathy, according to the European Field Guide-Book procedure, in Turin (n = 130) and Wales (n = 128, W). All Welsh patients and 70 in Turin (T1) were on standard diabetes care at their clinic or general practitioner, whereas 60 in Turin (T2) were on permanent group education. Results: According to 65%, 84% and 100% of patients in W, T1 and T2, respectively, diabetes may damage the eyes. Retinopathy had been heard of by 48% (W), 67% (T1) and 100% (T2). In T2, 82% of patients could give a meaningful description of retinopathy but only 17% could use correctly the word 'retina'. In W and T1, 16% and 19% could describe retinopathy but none could describe the retina. In W and T1, 47% and 57% believed they could not help with eye care, whereas 78% in T2 replied that they should control diabetes and 20% that eyes should be checked regularly. Regarding reasons for screening, 100% of patients in T2 answered 'prevention and checks', against 61% in T1 and only 9% in W. In T1 and W, 33% and 37% did not know why they were being screened. Conclusions: Patients' health perceptions and internal control mechanisms may be insufficiently developed for optimal participation in retinopathy screening. Diabetes care by long-term group education may address this problem.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036400307&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00784.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12358866; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00784.x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00784.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00784.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know