Complex aortic valve repair as a durable and effective alternative to valve replacement in children with aortic valve disease
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, ISSN: 0022-5223, Vol: 129, Issue: 3, Page: 551-558
2005
- 56Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations56
- Citation Indexes56
- 56
- CrossRef50
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
Article Description
This study was undertaken to determine the utility of aortic valve repair in children. A retrospective analysis was conducted on aortic valve surgery from 1973 to 2004 at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin. Procedures were classified as simple repairs (blunt valvotomy, commissurotomy with or without thinning, n = 147), repair of aortic insufficiency with ventricular septal defect (n = 22), complex repairs (any combination of additional procedures including suspension of prolapsed leaflets, leaflet extensions, repair of torn or perforated leaflets, annuloplasty, reduction of sinus of Valsalva plasty, and concomitant repair of supravalvular or subvalvular stenosis, n = 57), and replacements (n = 57, 20 mechanical, 2 porcine, and 35 human valves). Freedoms from reintervention for simple repairs and repair of aortic insufficiency with ventricular septal defect at 10 years were 86% ± 5% and 93.3% ± 6%, respectively. For complex valve repair, freedoms from reintervention at 1, 5, and 10 years were 94% ± 3%, 85% ± 6%, and 44% ± 15%, versus 96% ± 3%, 77% ± 9%, and 77% ± 9% for valve replacement ( P =.3). At intermediate follow-up, patients with complex valve repair had a residual gradient of 20 ± 21 mm Hg, and 94% were free of severe aortic insufficiency. Residual aortic stenosis ( P <.05) but not the preoperative diagnosis of combined aortic stenosis and insufficiency predicted the need for reintervention. Freedom from reintervention after complex valve repairs was not different from that after valve replacement, with acceptable residual aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Simple repairs and repair of aortic insufficiency with ventricular septal defect yielded excellent long-term freedom from reintervention.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522304015879; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.033; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=14644444528&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15746738; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022522304015879; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.033
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know