Utilization of guidelines for the management of hypertension in cardiovascular risk scoring of renal patients
Clinica Terapeutica, ISSN: 0009-9074, Vol: 157, Issue: 4, Page: 327-332
2006
- 1Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
Background. Recent guidelines for the management of hypertension by the European Societies of Hypertension and Cardiology (ESH-ESC), consider, besides normal and normal high blood pressure, also early renal failure as a significant factor scoring the individual cardiovascular (CV) risk in each patient. Considering that the nephrologists have not yet adopted a similar system to score CV risk in renal failure, we believed reasonable to evaluate whether the ESH-ESC guidelines were applicable to renal patients and to what extent useful to estimate the CV risk in chronic renal disease. Patients and Methods. According to the above-mentioned guidelines, CV risk score was evaluated in 386 ambulatory patients (212 M/174 F; aged 53±15 years) with the following clinical diagnosis: hypertension (n=48), lithiasis (n=49), chronic renal failure (n=182), transplantation (n=61) and dialysis (n=46). Results. We obtained a "no score" group and five progressive risk classes graded from 1 to 5. Infact thirthyfour cases were not scored because of "optimal" blood pressure control, whilst the remaining 352 averaged a score of 3.9±1.1 ("high" CV risk condition). In these, all the scores were present and the distribution of cases evidenced a prevailing of score 4 and 5 in chronic renal failure (19 and 52% of the cases, respectively) and in transplantation (26% and 39%), but not in hypertension and lithiasis. In dialysis, only score 4 and 5 (35% and 59% respectively) occurred, while 4 cases (6%) were not scored due to "optimal" blood pressure values. Target organ damage, acquired clinical conditions, modifl+able and non-modifiable risk factors had all a positive correlation with the risk score. Conclusions. Our study suggests that ESH-ESC guidelines for the management of hypertension can be used to obtain a global CV risk score also in chronic kidney diseases, with the exception of dialysis. In chronic renal failure, the risk of underestimating the real incidence of future CV events might be overcome, at least partially, by the possibility of highlighting in individual patients the concomitance of risk factors requiring a very early preventive and aggressive therapy.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know