PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Parasites of free‐ranging and captive american primates: A systematic review

Microorganisms, ISSN: 2076-2607, Vol: 9, Issue: 12
2021
  • 10
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 36
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 17
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    10
  • Captures
    36
  • Social Media
    17
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      17
      • Facebook
        17

Review Description

The diversity, spread, and evolution of parasites in non‐human primates (NHPs) is a relevant issue for human public health as well as for NHPs conservation. Although previous reviews have recorded information on parasites in NHPs (Platyrrhines) in the Americas, the increasing number of recent studies has made these inventories far from complete. Here, we summarize information about parasites recently reported in Platyrrhines, attempting to build on earlier reviews and identify information gaps. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Ninety‐three studies were included after the screening process. Records for 20 genera of NHPs, including 90 species were found. Most of the studies were conducted on captive individuals (54.1%), and morphological approaches were the most used for parasite identification. The most commonly collected biological samples were blood and stool, and Protozoa was the most frequent parasite group found. There is still scarce (if any) information on the parasites associated to several Platyrrhine species, especially for free‐ranging populations. The use of molecular identification methods can provide important contributions to the field of NHPs parasitology in the near future. Finally, the identification of parasites in NHPs populations will continue to provide relevant information in the context of pervasive habitat loss and fragmentation that should influence both human public health and wildlife conservation strategies.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know