Prediction of rockburst intensity grade based on convolutional neural network
Meitiandizhi Yu Kantan/Coal Geology and Exploration, ISSN: 1001-1986, Vol: 51, Issue: 10, Page: 94-103
2023
- 5Citations
- 52Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Usage52
- Downloads38
- Abstract Views14
Article Description
Rockburst is one of the urgent problems to be addressed in the process of deep resource extraction. In order to predict the rockburst disasters safely and efficiently, a rockburst intensity grade prediction model (MICE-CNN) based on the Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was proposed. Specifically, a predictive indicator system was established based on the main influencing factors and the acquisition conditions of rockburst. A total of 120 sets of raw data from rockburst cases were collected, with the outliers processed by pauta criterion. Then, the missing data were interpolated with the four interpolation models of RF, BLR, ET and KNN, which were selected using MICE. Besides, data interpolation was performed with the optimal model selected according to E, in combination with the two traditional interpolation methods (Mean and Median), resulting in a complete data set. In addition, the data were flattened into a 6×1×1 one-dimensional image data as the input layer, and the sizes of the convolutional kernel and pooling kernel were calculated to be 3×1 based on the size of the input layer. Moreover, zero-padding was applied for the feature edge processing. Batch normalization layers were added to improve the model stability and convergence speed. Thus, ReLU activation function and SGDM optimizer function were selected. Further, the CNN prediction model was trained, with accuracy rates of 100.00% for the training set and 91.67% for the validation set. Meanwhile, the RBF, SVM and PNN models were established for the comparison and verification of their test set data with that of the CNN model. Generally, the CNN model shows higher accuracy (91.67%) than the other models. By comparing the confusion matrix of the PNN model with the CNN model, it is found that the CNN model tends to overestimate the degree of rockburst compared to the actual results, indicating better safety after misjudgment. This demonstrates the feasibility of the MICE-CNN prediction model of rockburst intensity grade.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176242038&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.01.0018; https://cge.researchcommons.org/journal/vol51/iss10/11; https://cge.researchcommons.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2144&context=journal; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7584000&internal_id=7584000&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.01.0018; http://www.mtdzykt.com/cn/article/doi/10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.01.0018
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know