Phylogenetic analysis of algal symbionts associated with four north american amphibian Egg Masses
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 11, Page: e108915
2014
- 31Citations
- 256Usage
- 63Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations31
- Citation Indexes31
- 31
- CrossRef18
- Usage256
- Downloads233
- Abstract Views23
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
- Mentions3
- References3
- Wikipedia3
Article Description
Egg masses of the yellow-spotted salamander Ambystoma maculatum form an association with the green alga "Oophila amblystomatis" (Lambert ex Wille), which, in addition to growing within individual egg capsules, has recently been reported to invade embryonic tissues and cells. The binomial O. amblystomatis refers to the algae that occur in A. maculatum egg capsules, but it is unknown whether this population of symbionts constitutes one or several different algal taxa. Moreover, it is unknown whether egg masses across the geographic range of A. maculatum, or other amphibians, associate with one or multiple algal taxa. To address these questions, we conducted a phylogeographic study of algae sampled from egg capsules of A. maculatum, its allopatric congener A. gracile, and two frogs: Lithobates sylvatica and L. aurora. All of these North American amphibians form associations with algae in their egg capsules. We sampled algae from egg capsules of these four amphibians from localities across North America, established representative algal cultures, and amplified and sequenced a region of 18S rDNA for phylogenetic analysis. Our combined analysis shows that symbiotic algae found in egg masses of four North American amphibians are closely related to each other, and form a well-supported clade that also contains three strains of free-living chlamydomonads. We designate this group as the 'Oophila' clade, within which the symbiotic algae are further divided into four distinct subclades. Phylogenies of the host amphibians and their algal symbionts are only partially congruent, suggesting that host-switching and co-speciation both play roles in their associations. We also established conditions for isolating and rearing algal symbionts from amphibian egg capsules, which should facilitate further study of these egg mass specialist algae. Copyright:
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0108915; 10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84911877916&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393119; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t003; https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/biofac/40; https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=biofac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0108915; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.t003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915.g001; http://cupola.gettysburg.edu/biofac/40; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0108915; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108915&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know