HIV and concurrent sexual partnerships: Modelling the role of coital dilution
Journal of the International AIDS Society, ISSN: 1758-2652, Vol: 14, Issue: 1, Page: 44
2011
- 34Citations
- 131Usage
- 64Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- CrossRef28
- Usage131
- Downloads122
- Abstract Views9
- Captures64
- Readers64
- 60
Article Description
Background: The concurrency hypothesis asserts that high prevalence of overlapping sexual partnerships explains extraordinarily high HIV levels in sub-Saharan Africa. Earlier simulation models show that the network effect of concurrency can increase HIV incidence, but those models do not account for the coital dilution effect (non-primary partnerships have lower coital frequency than primary partnerships). Methods. We modify the model of Eaton et al (AIDS and Behavior, September 2010) to incorporate coital dilution by assigning lower coital frequencies to non-primary partnerships. We parameterize coital dilution based on the empirical work of Morris et al (PLoS ONE, December 2010) and others. Following Eaton et al, we simulate the daily transmission of HIV over 250 years for 10 levels of concurrency. Results: At every level of concurrency, our focal coital-dilution simulation produces epidemic extinction. Our sensitivity analysis shows that this result is quite robust; even modestly lower coital frequencies in non-primary partnerships lead to epidemic extinction. Conclusions: In order to contribute usefully to the investigation of HIV prevalence, simulation models of concurrent partnering and HIV epidemics must incorporate realistic degrees of coital dilution. Doing so dramatically reduces the role that concurrency can play in accelerating the spread of HIV and suggests that concurrency cannot be an important driver of HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa. Alternative explanations for HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa are needed. © 2011 Sawers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80052690747&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-14-44; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21914208; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1186/1758-2652-14-44; https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/econfac/20; https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=econfac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-14-44; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1186/1758-2652-14-44; http://archive.biomedcentral.com/1758-2652/14/44; http://jiasociety.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1758-2652-14-44?site=jiasociety.biomedcentral.com; http://jiasociety.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1758-2652-14-44; https://jiasociety.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/1758-2652-14-44; https://jiasociety.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1758-2652-14-44; http://cupola.gettysburg.edu/econfac/20
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know