Financial Risk Evaluation of Supplier
2014
- 53Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage53
- Abstract Views53
Interview Description
Every business faces financial risks which seem to affect the company’s financial performance in both the short and long run. One of the financial risks is working with an inadequate supplier, or a supplier whose financial performance is poor. If a supplier’s financial performance is poor, the supplier may go bankrupt leaving the company with no materials to work with. Even though a company may find a different supplier or may decide to manufacture certain products in the house if one of its current suppliers goes bankrupt, making the right decision or looking for a different supplier is time consuming and may cost the company a fortune. In order to avoid financial risk when dealing with supplier, every company needs to evaluate the financial risk of their suppliers. There are steps that need to be taken when evaluating a supplier: 1) Develop a critical supplier list; 2) Collect a supplier’s financial data; 3) Make projections from ratio analysis; 4) Develop a suppliers watch list; and 5) Continue closely monitoring the supplier. Evaluating the financial risk of every supplier is time consuming; therefore, companies may use their own finance or accounting departments or outsource these services to third parties. In either case, evaluating a supplier provides financial security for the company in the long run and insure its business runs smoothly and its customers are satisfied.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know