(Un)Lawful Bodies in Evelyne Trouillot’s Rosalie l’Infâme
2020
- 43Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage43
- Abstract Views43
Lecture / Presentation Description
This paper examines Evelyne Trouillot’s 2003 novel Rosalie l’Infâme and the ways that it expresses two areas of juridical concern during the slave-era: poisoning and pro-natal policies. It argues that the points of contact between postcolonial representations of enslaved bodies and the bodies of the law written to contain Black bodies produce what I identify as a corporeal pedagogy. A multidimensional and often paradoxical source of learning, a corporeal pedagogy underscores, in one instance, how the laws that served as instruments of colonial control codified and leveraged the knowledge about human bodies produced by slavery and the slave trade. Yet a corporeal pedagogy also sheds light on postcolonial representations of the body as a crucial source of self-knowledge and historical consciousness.Set in Saint-Domingue in the 1750s, a time of heightened fears of poisoning for white inhabitants, Rosalie brings readers into the heart of acts of resistance against enslavement. In particular, it reads as a case-study of the challenges enslaved women faced, and their struggles to control their bodies. This paper aims to investigate these strategies through the lens of laws concerning sanctions against Black poisoners as well as those intended to increase birth rates among the enslaved. It argues that the fruitful convergence of bodies of, in, and, at times, outside the law demonstrates how legal policies point to the “epistemic anxieties,” to use Ann Laura Stoler’s formulation, that emerge within the grain of colonial documents and archives. Through this dual-oriented approach to the roles bodies play inside key legal documents as well as in postcolonial representations of enslavement, this paper aims to bring additional insight into the ways that textual and corporeal bodies construct new moorings for understanding slavery and its ramifications.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know