Peter Kean to Susan Niemcewicz, January 21, 1808
1808
- 4Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4
- Abstract Views2
- Downloads2
Manuscript Description
Peter Kean wrote from Albany, New York to Susan Niemcewicz in Elizabethtown, New Jersey. Peter set out to Easton and hid road laid through Troy and Lansingburg, two beautiful villages situated on the banks of the Hudson both of them supported by the trade they carry on with New York (which was greatly injured by the Embargo). Met with Col. Troup some days ago and had a long conversation with him about Susan. Troup enquired politely about her health &c. The Mr. Schuyler that Peter went to visit was a son of the General’s. He ruined himself with debauches, was both bankrupt in health and fortune, and lost his character for veracity. Peter went to his home regarding a promise Mr. Schuyler made with Mr. S. however, regardless of all faith he absolutely refused to follow through. Peter spent the following evening with Mrs. Banyer where he met Mr. Jacob Le Roy who informed him that Mr. Rutherford claimed Gen. Read left all of his property in America to his wife’s relations. L spoke of coming to Albany to study Law. Peter’s final evening was spent with Mrs. B. While there, James Kane came in and they began teasing him about Miss Troup. The conversation led to Mr. Le Roy teasing Sally, he asked Mr. K who her admirer was. Mr. K replied, “that is a nice question, it might implicate some of the present company.” The blood rushed to Peter’s cheeks and he felt that he should have drunk for the first time in his life. Gen. Van Courtland arrived. The reason for his visit was private business but Peter suspected that he was taking measures for the presidential election.People mentioned: Philip Jeremiah Schuyler (1768-1835), General Philip Schuyler (1733-1804), Sarah Louisa Jay (1792-1818), Jacob Le Roy, Mrs. Banyer, Miss Troup, James Kane, General Van Courtland, and General Read.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know