ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAW OF SELF-DETERMINATION FROM EXTERNAL TO INTERNAL ASPECTS
2016
- 1,519Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,519
- Downloads1,219
- 1,219
- Abstract Views300
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The crisis within international law of self-determination cannot be ignored. This dissertation analyses and discusses the reasons for the crisis which are: the lack of analysis of the correlation of legal doctrines with doctrines of social science; a general absence of analysis of the changes occurring within contemporary international law due to the changes of doctrines of social science (particularly on the topics of the subjects of international law, and on the law of self-determination and recognition); a lack of analysis of the new laws within a context of rapid social development; and finally, the absence of a development of a methodology for the purpose of research and analysis of the current issues within international law (especially since the nineteenth century). Using the European family of nations as case study, this paper will analyze the history and development of nation states, and will propose a historical and comparative law method as a method both for general comparative research, and further research on the development of the law of self-determination as interrelated doctrine with the doctrine of constitutionalism. This dissertation will introduce the theory of constitutionalism within that framework of analysis, and will use it as a mechanism for the furtherance of the law of self-determination, recognition, the principle of peaceful coexistence; and finally, for the development of international law generally.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know