Evaluating Social Validity of the New England Center for Children Core Skill Assessment
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The social validity of a skill assessment may be the first step towards effective treatment; however, research on this topic is limited. The current study aimed to replicate and extend past research by evaluating the social validity of the New England Center for Children Core Skill Assessment (NECC-CSA). The NECC-CSA is a skill assessment that prioritizes foundational skills for individuals with autism. A two-part survey was distributed to nearly 200 professionals; and caregivers, guardians, and relatives from inside and outside of the NECC. The survey examined three dimensions of social validity. While Part 1 explored the social validity of the goals, Part 2 examined the social validity of the procedure and the effects. In Part 1, 72 skills were listed, 51 of which were skills from NECC-CSA and participants were asked whether each skill was foundational. Part 2 asked follow-up questions about the assessment procedure and outcome of each NECC-CSA core skill. Results indicated high agreement among participants that NECC-CSA core skills were foundational skills, hence, supported the social validity of the goals. Findings from Part 2 indicated that the social validity of the procedures and the effects need further evaluation. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know