Female directors: Why are some less informed than others?
Journal of Corporate Finance, ISSN: 0929-1199, Vol: 68, Page: 101938
2021
- 11Citations
- 48Usage
- 147Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef2
- Usage48
- Downloads28
- Abstract Views20
- Captures147
- Readers147
- 147
Article Description
We find the limited supply of female directors, rather than gender differences or boardroom biases, can create an informational disadvantage for some female independent directors, as measured by their open market trading profits. The information disparity is largely isolated to firms with abnormally low representation by female directors. Female independent directors who are located further away from the company's headquarters, have less industry experience or have shorter tenure exhibit the most limited information access. Accounting for these obstacles reduces the gender disparity in information. We further find that this information disparity among female independent directors contributes to the variation in their influence on board monitoring. More informed female independent directors are associated with fewer restatements, lower abnormal CEO compensation and higher Tobin's Q. Our results have several policy implications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119921000596; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101938; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103700265&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0929119921000596; https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/busadmin_faculty/146; https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1148&context=busadmin_faculty; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101938
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know