Dissemination of a dissonance-based body image promotion program in church settings: A preliminary controlled pilot study with adult women
Body Image, ISSN: 1740-1445, Vol: 36, Page: 263-268
2021
- 3Citations
- 11Usage
- 25Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef1
- Usage11
- Abstract Views11
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
Adult women report significant body dissatisfaction yet are often overlooked in body image promotion programs. Although few venues afford opportune settings for intervening with adult women, the church serves as a regular meeting place for many in the South of the United States. This study tested a dissonance-based body image program, Reclaiming Beauty (RB), adapted for adult women in church settings. Six groups ( n = 30) were led by two trained church leaders (peer-led) and three groups ( n = 21) were led by a trained peer leader and a researcher (researcher-co-led). RB participants, aged 30–77 years ( M = 53.1 ± 12.7), completed assessments pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. Waitlist-controls ( n = 31) completed assessments at time intervals consistent with intervention participants. RB participants reported significantly decreased thin-ideal internalization, body surveillance, and eating psychopathology at post-intervention and at 6 months post-intervention relative to controls. RB participants also reported significantly increased body satisfaction immediately post-intervention relative to controls, but this was not significant at 6 months post-intervention. Peer-led groups outperformed researcher-co-led groups on body surveillance at 6 months, but RB conditions did not otherwise differ. Our findings provide preliminary support for the dissemination of a culturally-modified dissonance-based body image program to adult women in church settings.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144520304460; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.12.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099623329&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33476989; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1740144520304460; https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/psych_faculty/219; https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1220&context=psych_faculty; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.12.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know