Effective defibrillation in a wet environment: A preliminary study
Vol: 2006, Page: 153
2006
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
A new hypothermia treatment, the Thermosuit™ consists of the application of a thin layer of water to the body surface. Hypothermic-induced patients are often post-resuscitative and may experience sequential fibrillation. Therefore, we examined whether defibrillation could be administered safely and effectively in such a wet environment. A 35 kg swine was anesthetized and placed inside the Thermosuit™ system. This consists of a water containing surround and pumping system. Defibrillation voltage and current were measured. Conventional AED disposable defibrillation electrodes were applied to the animal's chest. Fibrillation was created by applying a 50 volt signal to a pacing wire introduced into the heart. Following a 30-second period of fibrillation, defibrillation was attempted using Medtronic AED 1000 defibrillator. There were several test cases: Dry in the system, Wet in the functioning system, and Damp. Cooling water in the system was contaminated with saline to simulate potential conditions in clinical application. In each fibrillation-defibrillation sequence the heart was restarted successfully, this normally required less than 220 joules. There was only a small difference measured in the overall defibrillation voltage and current as applied to the electrodes for the several cases. Thus, under-water defibrillation is safe and can be performed effectively. © 2006 IEEE.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know