Prototyping a Micro-pluriverse: Performed Cosmologies to Decolonize Augmented Reality
Pivot 2020: Designing a World of Many Centers
2020
- 489Usage
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage489
- Downloads294
- Abstract Views195
- Captures6
- Readers6
Conference Paper Description
How do we apply theories of decolonization to an emerging technology such as augmented reality (AR)? We explain how our co-creative pilot laboratory contributes to efforts in decolonizing augmented reality through embodied prototyping, and designing pluriversality in AR to “augment” de-centered narratives. Our initial methods included facilitating reading discussions and affinity mapping (to transpose theories into action). “Thinking-feeling” (Escobar, 2015) and “power-geometries” (Massey, 1991) became a means to engage with our own mental models and constructs, as they relate to colonization. This led us to build a series of prompts organized into a “Cosmology Toolkit” (Escobedo, Kris & Sweidan, 2020). We conducted field research in our local geography, as a means to critically engage with space and address historic psychogeographies. Using TorchAR (a free, proprietary AR design tool), we performed expressions of our personal cosmologies, which were recorded as videos and layered in situ, to prototype a micro- pluriverse.
Bibliographic Details
https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/pluriversaldesign/pivot2020/researchpapers/14; https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/pluriversal2020/researchpapers/14
https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/pluriversaldesign/pivot2020/researchpapers/14; http://dx.doi.org/10.21606/pluriversal.2020.033; https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030&context=pluriversaldesign; https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/pluriversal2020/researchpapers/14; https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2641&context=drs-conference-papers; https://dx.doi.org/10.21606/pluriversal.2020.033; https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/pluriversaldesign/pivot2020/researchpapers/14/
Design Research Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know