Research on Legal Text Matching Based on Pre-training Model
Vol: 5, Issue: 3, Page: 13-13
2023
- 29Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage29
- Downloads23
- Abstract Views6
Artifact Description
[Purpose/significance]This study aims to solve the problem of traditional short text matching models being difficult to apply to long text matching tasks such as legal case retrieval. [Method/process]For the task of legal case matching, this paper proposes a Legal Text Matching model based on RoFormer (LTMR). In the coding layer, the legal case is encoded through the RoFormer model and the legal feature extractor. In the reasoning layer, the context and interactive information of long text are further extracted by using interactive attention and self-attention mechanisms. We conducted the empirical research by applying the proposed model to the CAIL2019-SCM dataset. [Result/conclusion]Compared to the baseline methods, the LTMR model achieved the best results. The research sheds light on promoting the application of legal case matching.
Bibliographic Details
https://eng.kjqbyj.com/journal/vol5/iss3/2; https://eng.kjqbyj.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=journal; http://dx.doi.org/10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2023.03.002; https://dx.doi.org/10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2023.03.002; https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2023.03.002
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know