A COMPARISON OF VERBAL AND WRITTEN METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES USED BY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN A LANGUAGE ARTS CLASSROOM
2017
- 592Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage592
- Downloads509
- Abstract Views83
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The purpose of the study was to compare verbal and written metacognitive strategies used by 10th grade students in an English Language Arts (ELA) classroom. A convenience sample of forty-seven students were divided into two equivocal treatment groups. Both groups were first pretested by completing an ACT reading passage with accompanying questions. Following the reading task, both groups completed the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Inventory (MARSI). The sample was divided into two treatment groups, one group receiving daily enrichment style instruction in verbal metacognitive strategies, and the other treatment group receiving instruction in both written and verbal strategies. Following the enrichment sessions, students in both groups were post tested with a similar reading comprehension task, and completed the MARSI again. The data were analyzed using descriptive, inferential, and associative/predictive techniques to address the research questions. The findings suggest that regardless of the method of strategy use, metacognitive strategy instruction is effective and in the study, and produced a statistically significant increase in student reported use, as well as improved performance on an academic reading task. Verbal strategies appeared to have an edge over written and verbal combination for frequency of use and overall reading comprehension achievement, although not statistically significant. When considering the issue of which metacognitive strategy exerts a more productive relational/predictive effect, the combination of written and verbal strategies seems to be preferable. Limitations and implications for professional practice were discussed, and future research was suggested.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know