The Relationship Between Servant Leadership and Job Satisfaction within the Vaccines Sales Division of a Large U.S.-Based Pharmaceutical Organization
2022
- 48Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage48
- Abstract Views48
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The purpose of this study was to examine the theory of servant leadership as it related to servant job satisfaction for the employees of the vaccines division of a large U.S.-based pharmaceutical organization. There were four relevant findings generated by analysis of the research data: (a) relating to servant leadership, the OLA overall mean score was 229.656 with item mean score of 3.596, establishing an Org 4 organizational health level of Paternalistic, Positive Health, (b) relating to job satisfaction, the overall mean score was 24.0729 with item mean score of 4.012, establishing an Org 5 organizational health level of Servant, Excellent Health, (c) the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between servant leadership, current mood, mood over the past six months, and satisfaction with the benefits package to job satisfaction were all statistically significant, with r values ranging between .4580 and .7637, p < .001, (d) r-square value, the coefficient of determination, for servant leadership, current mood, mood over the past six months, and satisfaction with the benefits package to job satisfaction to job satisfaction were all statistically significant, with r-square values ranging between .2097 and .5876. These findings are consistent with past research that also used the OLA instrument to look at the same variables—servant leadership and job satisfaction—within other industry types. As measured by the OLA, the statistically significant relationship between servant leadership and job satisfaction shows that servant leadership is a variable that positively affects job satisfaction of the participating members of the target group. Based on these positive results and the demonstrated relationship between the two variables, leaders within pharmaceutical organizations could foster servant leadership behaviors to improve employee job satisfaction levels and promote positive organizational health.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know