RPM w handlu elektronicznym – la nouvelle vague czy nihil novi? Przegląd praktyki decyzyjnej organów ochrony konkurencji
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny, Vol: 7, Issue: 8, Page: 106-116
2018
- 5Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage5
- Abstract Views3
- Downloads2
Article Description
The aim of this paper is to analyse selected decisional practice of the European Commission and national competition authorities concerning RPM agreements in the e-commerce sector. This research is motivated by the recent e-commerce sector inquiry conducted by the European Commission. Conclusions from this inquiry suggest that suppliers frequently influence the pricing policy of their retailers to the detriment of competition and final consumers. This paper describes first the characteristics of e-commerce and considers features, which may be potentially relevant from the competition law perspective, differentiating it from brick-and-mortar distribution. It is a defendable view that RPM in e-commerce does not require the establishment of new assessment tools. This hypothesis seems to be further confirmed by the conclusions derived from the review of selected decisional practice. At the same time, analysis of RPM in e-commerce requires the competition authorities to carefully consider the economic context of the arrangements. In particular, the motivation of the supplier should be thoroughly analysed in the context of counteracting free-riding and protecting the value of the brand.
Bibliographic Details
University of Warsaw
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know