Różnice w ocenie zdolności kredytowej konsumenta w państwach członkowskich UE jako ograniczenie jednolitego rynku kredytów – analiza w kontekście zasady minimalizacji danych z art. 5 RODO
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny, Vol: 8, Issue: 8, Page: 92-100
2019
- 15Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage15
- Downloads9
- Abstract Views6
Article Description
It is the basic principle that every financial institution granting a loan – including a bank – is obliged to assess the creditworthiness of the customer who applies for such a loan. The banking law doctrine recognizes that this obligation is a public duty for the bank and results from the nature of the bank as an institution of public trust, which assesses creditworthiness also in the interest of depositors whose funds have been entrusted to the bank. The subject of the paper will be to present the situation and legal status in several Member States of the European Union with regard to detailed regulations regarding the assessment of creditworthiness, especially in the case of consumer credit. In general, EU Member States can be divided into three categories in this respect: the first is where the method and scope of capacity assessment are left to the lender’s own decision; the second one is where the guidelines for carrying out the capacity are included in the recommendations of the banking market supervisor; while the third one – the most strictly regulated category – has legal provisions specifying exactly how creditworthiness should be assessed. This issue and the differences in regulations at the national level have three important references. The first is the obligation to implement the assumption of ‘responsible lending’, the second is the risk of creating a barrier to the implementation of a single credit market in the EU, and the third is the principle of minimizing the scope of personal data processed on the basis of the provisions of the GDPR.
Bibliographic Details
University of Warsaw
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know