The Government Procurement Agreement and Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA): Lessons from Japan’s experience
Vol: 12, Issue: 1
2020
- 177Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage177
- Downloads109
- Abstract Views68
Paper Description
This article explores the effects of MFN clauses on the procedural and transparency rules set out in the 1994 GPA, the Revised GPA and government procurement chapters of FTAs and how procedural and transparency rules are expanded to countries that are parties to FTAs containing MFN clauses relating to government procurement, by analyzing the effects of the two most recent FTAs concluded by Japan (i.e. Japan-EU EPA and the CPTPP). This article then proposes how other countries, including India, should take careful note of the effects of the procedural rules and the MFN clauses regarding government procurement, and consider which procedural rules may be expanded to other countries beyond the parties to the FTA in question and which will not, when considering whether to enter into new FTAs containing government procurement provisions.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know