Investigative primary science: A problem-based learning approach
Australian Journal of Teacher Education, ISSN: 1835-517X, Vol: 36, Issue: 9, Page: 36-57
2011
- 44Citations
- 3,460Usage
- 226Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations44
- Citation Indexes41
- 41
- CrossRef8
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage3,460
- Downloads2,738
- 2,738
- Abstract Views722
- Captures226
- Readers226
- 218
Article Description
This study reports on the success of using a problem-based learning approach (PBL) as a pedagogical mode of learning open inquiry science within a traditional four-year undergraduate elementary teacher education program. In 2010, a problem-based learning approach to teaching primary science replaced the traditional content driven syllabus. During the 13 week semester, a cohort of 150 elementary preservice teachers embarked on a Design and Make project to solve an individually chosen real world problem. Over one week, the pre-service teachers used a problem based mode of learning in conjunction with an open scientific inquiry to showcase individual working models (prototypes) in a public science museum to schools, interested stakeholders and the general public. The PBL mode of teaching science was well suited to the recommended New South Wales Science and Technology K-6 Syllabus Design and Make learning process. The PBL course had a positive impact on the pre-service teachers' motivation to teach science ideas within a real world context. This article reports on the PBL science program and offers recommendations to future instructors of undergraduate science education who may include PBL as a part of their science curriculum.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871750933&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n10.1; http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol36/iss10/2; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol36/iss10/2; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1539&context=ajte; https://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n10.1; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol36/iss10/2/
Edith Cowan University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know