Security risk management in the Asia Pacific region: what are security professional using?
2011
- 2,157Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2,157
- Downloads1,758
- 1,758
- Abstract Views399
Conference Paper Description
The Asia Pacific (APAC) region encompasses a heterogeneous group of nation-states. Like the APAC region, the security industry operates within a diverse and multi-disciplined knowledge base, with risk management being a fundamental knowledge domain within security. Nevertheless, there has been limited understanding of what security professionals use when applying security risk management. The study was designed to gain a better understanding of risk management practice in place throughout APAC. Questions were generated to gauge an understanding of current practice and levels of implementation of standards and frameworks. Participants were drawn from many industries, using non-probabilistic sampling methods in a “snowball” response to an online survey. Results were collected and analysed to provide interpretations and findings, and where appropriate, weighted factor analysis were conducted. Findings indicated that the majority of APAC nation-states do not have a defined risk management standard, but security practitioners use their own internal framework. Following this approach, security practitioners use ISO 31000 and AS/NZS 4360 standards in parity, even considering their differing age. ISO 28000 Supply Chain Security Management was a popular standard, driven from Singapore. Nevertheless, the use of these standards should still raise concern due to a lack of a directed security risks management frameworks that incorporates threat, vulnerability and criticality. Further study needs to better understand what risk management techniques and frameworks security practitioners are using.
Bibliographic Details
https://ro.ecu.edu.au/asi/12; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=asi; http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/75/57a00f0dac5c1; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2011/35; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=ecuworks2011; http://ro.ecu.edu.au/asi/12; https://doi.org/10.4225%2F75%2F57a00f0dac5c1; https://dx.doi.org/10.4225/75/57a00f0dac5c1; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/asi/12/
secau Security Research Centre, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know