Experimental Appraisal of Efficiency of Predictive Approaches for Forces and Work in Extruding Hollow Components from Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Materials
2009
- 31Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage31
- Abstract Views31
Article Description
In the present study a brief review is presented made of previous investigations which looked at the current practices in a contained tube extrusion process i.e. Hooker extrusion process. This is followed by the results of a systematic study of press forces (and hence press power) and press work, when extruding S1010 cold rolled steel and 1200 aluminium billet work materials using specially designed tool sets tested in uncoated and coated conditions. The aim was to study the accuracy of reported predictive equations for force and work predictions, and to examine both the pattern and quantities of the experimental forces and work for uncoated and tin coated tools. Results showed that the force and work trends were not influenced qualitatively by the tool substrate material or tool surface coatings. The best predictions for forces and work were for the steel billet materials and the uncoated tools. In the coated conditions the tools reduced, on average, the total press force by ~15% and the total press work by ~14.5%, and therefore they were economically efficient. Moreover, the products made by the coated tools exhibited better quality than items produced by uncoated tools.
Bibliographic Details
Svaz Kovaren Ceske Republiky
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know