Multi Research Methods Using Captive Respondents
2010
- 50Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage50
- Abstract Views50
Conference Paper Description
Student samples can present a large, convenient, cost effective and questionnaire savvy group of respondents. They have been used extensively across disciplines, cultures and with a diverse range of methodologies. With questions such as “Are student’s real people?” and “Do their response patterns accurately reflect other populations?” the generalisability of student samples has been debated extensively in the literature, particularly during the 1970’s. It was concluded that students make appropriate samples when they represented similar profiles on important characteristics to the population of interest. Students offer academics an efficient, useful and insightful sample group. They are a captive audience and usually familiar with the task of completing questionnaires using scales and measurement items. This paper highlights the benefits of using an appropriate student sample, in this case a group of students on an academic study abroad field trip. Being an accessible group, they were exposed to a number of data collection techniques both quantitative and qualitative during the field trip. The aim of the research was to examine students’ level of engagement and extent of social, cultural and academic learning via the field trip experience. The data collection methods included: a pre trip questionnaire on student field trip expectations, researcher observations, capturing video footage, interviews with students and hosts, written student introspection both during and on return from the trip and follow - up discussion with the students post trip including reference to student photos and memorabilia. Student engagement and ultimately student learning via field trips provides a host of positive outcomes including the alignment with many university strategic planning initiatives. Catch cries such as producing global students and students with an international outlook will continue to act as drivers for offshore field trips. The use of multiple methods as discussed in this paper provides student field trip planners with unique and previously untapped sources of valuable data to understand the student learning processes and support the ongoing use of field trips as a pedagogically sound teaching and learning approach.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know