Reflections on occupational science in 2022
British Journal of Occupational Therapy, ISSN: 1477-6006, Vol: 86, Issue: 4, Page: 255-256
2023
- 19Usage
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage19
- Abstract Views19
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
The discipline of occupational science originated in the late 1980s as developed by an Emeritus Professor Betty Yerxa at the University of Southern California and concurrently by Professor Ann Wilcock in Australia. In this editorial, we have been asked to provide our perspectives on where occupational science is now and to articulate some of the current key developments and relevance for occupational therapy. The collective experience of a global pandemic over the last two and a half years with restrictions on occupational engagement and daily life has brought concepts from occupational science to the fore. COVID-19 has brought significant occupational disruption, and the initial public health responses involved occupational deprivation, and marginalisation with associated ill effects on health and well-being.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141349045&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03080226221135374; http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03080226221135374; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2022-2026/1478; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2478&context=ecuworks2022-2026
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know