Gendered Self-Views Across 62 Countries: A Test of Competing Models
Social Psychological and Personality Science, ISSN: 1948-5514, Vol: 14, Issue: 7, Page: 808-824
2023
- 21Citations
- 144Usage
- 55Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- CrossRef21
- Usage144
- Downloads110
- Abstract Views34
- Captures55
- Readers55
- 55
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent News
Investigators at University of Gdansk Detail Findings in Personality Science (Gendered Self-views Across 62 Countries: a Test of Competing Models)
2024 OCT 17 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Science Daily -- Investigators publish new report on Science - Personality Science.
Article Description
Social role theory posits that binary gender gaps in agency and communion should be larger in less egalitarian countries, reflecting these countries’ more pronounced sex-based power divisions. Conversely, evolutionary and self-construal theorists suggest that gender gaps in agency and communion should be larger in more egalitarian countries, reflecting the greater autonomy support and flexible self-construction processes present in these countries. Using data from 62 countries (N = 28,640), we examine binary gender gaps in agentic and communal self-views as a function of country-level objective gender equality (the Global Gender Gap Index) and subjective distributions of social power (the Power Distance Index). Findings show that in more egalitarian countries, gender gaps in agency are smaller and gender gaps in communality are larger. These patterns are driven primarily by cross-country differences in men’s self-views and by the Power Distance Index (PDI) more robustly than the Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI). We consider possible causes and implications of these findings.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141763680&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19485506221129687; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19485506221129687; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2022-2026/1481; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2481&context=ecuworks2022-2026; https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/psy_fac/353; https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1355&context=psy_fac
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know