Hydrogen wettability of carbonate formations: Implications for hydrogen geo-storage
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, ISSN: 0021-9797, Vol: 614, Page: 256-266
2022
- 126Citations
- 18Usage
- 119Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations126
- Citation Indexes126
- 126
- CrossRef33
- Usage18
- Abstract Views18
- Captures119
- Readers119
- 119
Article Description
The mitigation of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and increasing global energy demand are two driving forces toward the hydrogen economy. The large-scale hydrogen storage at the surface is not feasible as hydrogen is very volatile and highly compressible. An effective way for solving this problem is to store it in underground geological formations (i.e. carbonate reservoirs). The wettability of the rock/H 2 /brine system is a critical parameter in the assessment of residual and structural storage capacities and containment safety. However, the presence of organic matters in geo-storage formations poses a direct threat to the successful hydrogen geo-storage operation and containment safety. As there is an intensive lack of literature on hydrogen wettability of calcite-rich formations, advancing ( θa ) and receding ( θr ) contact angles of water/H 2 /calcite systems were measured as a function of different parameters, including pressure (0.1–20 MPa), temperature (298–353 K), salinity (0–4.95 mol.kg −1 ), stearic acid (as a representative of organic acid) concentration (10 -9 − 10 -2 mol/L), tilting plate angle (0° − 45°) and surface roughness (RMS = 341 nm, 466 nm, and 588 nm). The results of the study show that at ambient conditions, the system was strongly water-wet, but became intermediate wet at high pressure. The water contact angle strongly increased with stearic acid concentration making the calcite surface H 2 -wet. Moreover, the contact angle increased with salinity and tilting plate angle but decreased with temperature and surface roughness. We conclude that the optimum conditions for de-risking H 2 storage projects in carbonates are low pressures, high temperatures, low salinity, and low organic surface concentration. Therefore, it is essential to measure these effects to avoid overestimation of hydrogen geo-storage capacities and containment security.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021979722000819; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.068; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123632916&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35101673; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021979722000819; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2022-2026/336; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336&context=ecuworks2022-2026; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.068
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know