The tourist metasafety framework (TMF): Toward a holistic understanding of tourist safety
Tourism Management, ISSN: 0261-5177, Vol: 107, Page: 105071
2025
- 1Citations
- 1Usage
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
This article introduces the Tourist Metasafety Framework, integrating state and trait safety for a holistic view of tourist safety. Utilizing LDA, Study 1 analyzed 650 tourist interviews, revealing three dimensions of state safety—physiological, psychological, and ontological—and identifying trait safety as secure attachment. Study 2 explored the influence of the TMF componeents on tourist safety behavior, finding that secure attachment positively impacts safety compliance and participation. Additionally, the three dimensions of state safety serve as parallel mediators between secure attachment and safety behaviors, while the public opinion climate of risk negatively moderates this relationship. This research elucidates the behavioral regulation process of tourist metasafety as "trait safety → state safety → safety response," offering theoretical insights and practical guidance for enhancing tourist safety behaviors and managing negative public opinions in tourist destinations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517724001900; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105071; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85205920235&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261517724001900; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2022-2026/5559; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6560&context=ecuworks2022-2026; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2022-2026/5246; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6247&context=ecuworks2022-2026; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105071
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know