The relationship is everything: Women׳s reasons for choosing a privately practising midwife in Western Australia
Midwifery, ISSN: 0266-6138, Vol: 31, Issue: 8, Page: 772-778
2015
- 35Citations
- 39Usage
- 142Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef6
- Usage39
- Abstract Views39
- Captures142
- Readers142
- 142
Article Description
the purpose of this study was to describe women׳s reasons for choosing to birth with a privately practising midwife. a modified grounded theory methodology was used. the sample comprised 14 Western Australian women who had received maternity care from a privately practising midwife within the previous five years. data analysis revealed three categories: the first was conceptualised as ‘I knew what I wanted from my caregiver’, which included sub-categories of: I wanted continuity of care; I wanted a relationship with my care provider; and I wanted a care provider with the same childbirth philosophy as me. The second encapsulated ‘I knew what I wanted from my pregnancy and birth experience,’ with two sub-categories, I wanted a natural, active, intervention free pregnancy and birth and I wanted my partner and family to be included. The final category was labelled ‘I was willing to get the research to get what I wanted’ and incorporated two sub-categories, I researched my care options and I researched my care provider options and the evidence around pregnancy and birth to be actively involved. findings offer insight around women׳s reasons for choosing this model of midwifery care and highlight that women know exactly what they want from their caregiver. Women valued working with their midwife towards a shared goal of an intervention-free, normal birth, researched their options and found mainstream services restrictive and focused on medical risk status rather than on the individual woman. findings will be of interest to maternity care practitioners and policy makers, as they highlight why some women prefer a social model of midwifery care that reflects a family centred, individualised and holistic approach. This insight can inform the development of maternity health care practices to recognise and accommodate the needs and values of all childbearing women.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613815001278; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.012; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84930924714&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26001949; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613815001278; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/1158; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2159&context=ecuworkspost2013; http://www.midwiferyjournal.com/article/S0266-6138(15)00127-8/abstract; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613815001278; http://www.midwiferyjournal.com/article/S0266-6138(15)00127-8/abstract?rss%3Dyes%26utm_source%3Dbirthpros.com%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter; http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/1158
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know