Maternity-care: measuring women’s perceptions
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, ISSN: 0952-6862, Vol: 29, Issue: 1, Page: 89-99
2016
- 5Citations
- 34Usage
- 72Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef2
- Usage34
- Abstract Views34
- Captures72
- Readers72
- 72
Article Description
Purpose – Achieving maternity-care outcomes that align with women’s needs, preferences and expectations is important but theoretically driven measures of women’s satisfaction with their entire maternity-care experience do not appear to exist. The purpose of this paper is to outline the development of an instrument to assess women’s perception of their entire maternity-care experience. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire was developed on the basis of previous research and informed by a framework of standard service quality categories covering the spectrum of typical consumer concerns. A pilot survey with a sample of 195 women who had recent experience of birth was undertaken to establish valid and reliable scales pertaining to different stages of maternity care. Exploratory factor analysis was used to interpret scales and convergent validity was assessed using a modified version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Findings – Nine theoretically informed, reliable and valid stand-alone scales measuring the achievement of different dimensions of women’s expectancies of public maternity care were developed. The study scales are intended for use in identifying some potential areas of focus for quality improvement in the delivery of maternity care. Research limitations/implications – Reliable and valid tools for monitoring the extent to which services respond to women’s expectations of their entire maternity care form part of the broader toolkit required to adequately manage health-care quality. This study offers guidance on the make-up of such tools. Originality/value – The scales produced from this research offer a means to assess maternity care across the full continuum of care and are brief and easy to use.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84954442934&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-06-2015-0078; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26771063; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2015-0078/full/html; http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2015-0078; http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full-xml/10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2015-0078; http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2015-0078; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/1477; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2479&context=ecuworkspost2013; https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/96cca96f-6c18-492e-8a8a-42774c535b52; https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/maternity-care-measuring-womens-perceptions; https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/maternitycare-measuring-womens-perceptions(96cca96f-6c18-492e-8a8a-42774c535b52).html; http://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/maternitycare-measuring-womens-perceptions(96cca96f-6c18-492e-8a8a-42774c535b52).html; http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/1477
Emerald
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know