In the shadow of the ivory tower: Experiences of midwives and nurses undertaking PhDs
Nurse Education Today, ISSN: 0260-6917, Vol: 65, Page: 36-40
2018
- 17Citations
- 344Usage
- 75Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- CrossRef17
- 17
- Usage344
- Downloads330
- Abstract Views14
- Captures75
- Readers75
- 75
Article Description
The aims of this study were to gain an understanding of the experiences of nurses and midwives enrolled in a PhD, explore any barriers that PhD students encounter whilst completing the degree, and develop recommendations for consideration in formulating support strategies to encourage completion for nurses and midwives enrolled on a PhD degree. It is important to understand what is happening at doctoral level education for nurses and midwives, and how those enrolled on PhD courses can successfully complete their studies, transition learning, and acquire the ability to undertake research into the clinical environments. The criteria for inclusion into the study was that participants were either a Registered Nurse or Registered Midwife enrolled in a PhD degree. A mixed methodology, non-experimental design approach was used with purposive sampling in an anonymous survey, that included both qualitative and quantitative questions to collect data in 2017. Supervisors and supervision were the focus of the participant's responses, and issues were identified in negotiating the right supervisors for nurse/midwife PhD students. PhD students would benefit from specific teaching and the opportunity to discuss issues that occur as part of the PhD process. Academia needs to consider new approaches to more effectively integrate teaching time into supervision, thereby optimising PhD completion for nursing and midwifery PhD students.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691718300893; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.017; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042912367&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524838; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260691718300893; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/4141; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5147&context=ecuworkspost2013; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.017
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know