Robust Placement and Sizing of Charging Stations from a Novel Graph Theoretic Perspective
IEEE Access, ISSN: 2169-3536, Vol: 8, Page: 118593-118602
2020
- 6Citations
- 199Usage
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef3
- Usage199
- Downloads188
- Abstract Views11
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
This paper proposes analytical approaches to extend the capacity of existing networks of electric vehicles (EVs) by placement of additional charging stations (CSs) as well as determining the sizes of existing and new CSs in order to handle future expansions of EVs. The EV flow at CSs is modeled by a graph where nodes are potential locations for CSs and edges are uncertain parameters representing the variable EV flow at CSs. The required extra CS locations are explored by transforming the CS placement problem into a controllability framework addressed by maximum matching principle (MMP). To find the sizes of each CS, the graph of CS network is partitioned featuring only one CS in each subgraph. The size of CS in each subgraph is then determined by transforming the problem into the problem of robust stability of a system with uncertain parameters where each parameter is associated with an edge of subgraph. The zero exclusion principle is then tested for the related Kharitonov rectangles and polygonal polynomials of closed loop system with selected feedback gain as CS capacity. The proposed analytical approach is tested on the existing Tesla CS Network of Sydney. The locations of extra required CSs as well as the sizes of existing and new CSs are determined to maintain the waiting times at all stations below the threshold level.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088020257&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3005677; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9127929/; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/8210; https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9216&context=ecuworkspost2013
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know