Juror perception: criminal verdicts based on race
Vol: 9, Issue: 1
2003
- 2,011Usage
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2,011
- Downloads1,908
- 1,908
- Abstract Views103
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
Are Juries Free From Racial Bias Possible?
The right to a fair trial by an impartial jury is a fundamental principle of the U.S. justice system. Research has shown that jurors are not infallible to bias, and that there are ways to address the problem.
Article Description
Many studies have investigated factors that affect juror decision making. The results of these studies vary. This study was designed to examine the effect of race of jurors on their perceptions of guilt in a criminal case, and whether or not race of the defendant influenced the juror's perception of guilt. College students served as participants and were asked to read a summary of a criminal case in which the defendant was in possession of marijuana. The race of the defendant was varied (black, white, or race not specified) and subjects were required to determine if the defendant was guilty of simple possession, or guilty of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. It was hypothesized that the black defendant would be found guilty of the distribution charge more frequently than the white defendant or the defendant whose race was not specified. However, a chi-square analysis indicated that the frequency of convictions was not dependent on race of defendant. It was also hypothesized that white participants would convict the defendant of the distribution charge more frequently than black participants. Results of a chi-square analysis supported this hypothesis at the .01 level. These results indicate that race of a juror may affect perception of guilt in a criminal case. Implications of this study are important in terms of juror decision making and what it means to be tried by a jury of ones peers.
Bibliographic Details
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know