Eksekusi putusan hakim dalam sengketa perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman
Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, ISSN: 1829-5789, Vol: 14, Issue: 2, Page: 128-138
2017
- 1Citations
- 223Usage
- 80Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Usage223
- Downloads140
- Abstract Views83
- Captures80
- Readers80
- 80
Article Description
This article is based on research intended at describing the execution of verdict of private case in court of Sleman Regency and its obstacles. It was a descriptive qualitative research. It was found that the excecution of verdict of private case in court of Sleman Regency begins by accustion or submission of execution by appelant and ends execution by confiscation. Its obstacle were: (1) its high cost as burdance of appelant; (2) the lack of qualified personels; and (3) the rivalry or rejection of accusted. The efforts to overcome these obstacles were: (1) the chief of regency court encourages both sides to compromise between initiator of accustion and his/her rival (accusted) peacefully; (2) send a personel substitude of seizure in calling conflicting side and proposing aditional personels but not yet succesful; and (3) the persoel of seizure inform or sends the unsolved problem through electrinic devices to Sleman Regency in order to suspend its execution.
Bibliographic Details
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/16852; https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/viewFile/16852/pdf; http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i2.16852; https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/civics/vol14/iss2/1; https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=civics; https://dx.doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i2.16852
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know