Analisis kesesuaian materi buku teks Kemendikbud matematika kelas VII dengan Kurikulum 2013
PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, ISSN: 1978-4538, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: 12-22
2017
- 101Usage
- 189Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage101
- Downloads52
- Abstract Views49
- Captures189
- Readers189
- 189
Article Description
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan kesesuaian buku teks Kemendikbud Matematika kelas VII edisi revisi 2014 dengan Kurikulum 2013 dilihat dari Standar Isi, Standar Proses, dan Standar Penilaian. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan analisis konten. Teknik analisis data dilakukan dengan tahap pendefinisian unit, penentuan sampel, pencatatan, pereduksi data, penarikan kesimpulan, dan penarasian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesesuaian materi dalam buku dengan Standar Isi pada Kurikulum 2013 dilihat dari (1) cakupan materi adalah sebesar 90,91%. Pada cakupan materi dalam buku, tidak terdapat pokok bahasan Bidang Cartesius. (2) Kesesuaian KD adalah sebesar 95,45%. (3) Keluasan materi adalah sebesar 90,91%. (4) Kedalaman materi adalah sebesar 90,91%. (5) Keakuratan materi adalah sebesar 81,82%. (6) penyajian materi adalah sebesar 87,27%. Kesesuaian materi dalam buku dengan Standar Proses pada Kurikulum 2013 dilihat dari substansinya adalah sebesar 90,9%. Kesesuaian materi dalam buku dengan Standar Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013 adalah sebesar 54,55%.Kata Kunci: buku teks matematika, materi, standar isi, standar proses, standar penilaian, kurikulum 2013An Analysis of Content of the Relevance of the Materials in the Mathematics Textbook for Grade VII to Curriculum 2013AbstractThis study aimed to describe the relevance of the materials in the 2014 revised edition mathematics textbook for Grade VII published by Puskurbuk to Curriculum 2013 in terms of the Content Standar, the Process Standar, and the Assessment Standar. This research was a qualitative study using content analysis. The data were analyzed by means of the instruments that had been validated. The data analysis was carried out through the stages of unit definition, recording, data reduction, conclusion drawing, and narration. The results of the study showed that the relevance of the materials in the book to the Content Standar in Curriculum 2013 is as follows. (1) In terms of the materials coverage, the relevance is 90.91%. (2) In terms of Basic Competencies (BC) in Curriculum 2013, it is 95.45%. (3) In terms of the materials breadth, it is 90.91%. (4) In terms of the materials depth it is 90.91%. (5) In terms of the materials accuracy, it is 81.82%. (6) In terms of the materials presenting, it is 87.27%. The relevance of the materials in the book to the Process Standar in Curriculum 2013 in terms of the substance is 90.9%. The relevance of the materials in the book to the Assessment Standard in Curruculum 2013 is 54.55%.Keywords: mathematics textbook, content, content standar, process standar, assessment standar, curriculum 2013
Bibliographic Details
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/14057; https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras/article/viewFile/14057/pdf; http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14057; https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/pythagoras/vol12/iss1/2; https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=pythagoras; https://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14057
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know