Wanted: Positive Arguments for Markets
Journal of Value Inquiry, ISSN: 1573-0492, Vol: 51, Issue: 4, Page: 641-645
2017
- 2Citations
- 41Usage
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Usage41
- Downloads40
- Abstract Views1
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
Many people believe that some things, like kidneys or sex, should not be for sale. Let us call these things “contested commodities.” Against this, Brennan and Jaworksi defend “markets without limits” (hereafter: MwL). According to this thesis: “If you may do it for free, you may do it for money.” Since we can give away our kidneys for free and have sex for free, we should be able to do these things for money. Brennan and Jaworksi deftly blend rigorous philosophical argument with the latest research in social science to counter some of the most prominent against commodification. But, I will argue, their arguments stop short of establishing MwL. Brennan and Jaworksi do not say enough in favor of markets in contested commodities.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85032817961&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10790-017-9613-x; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10790-017-9613-x; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10790-017-9613-x.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10790-017-9613-x/fulltext.html; https://scholars.bentley.edu/philosophy_facpubs/10; https://scholars.bentley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=philosophy_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10790-017-9613-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10790-017-9613-x
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know