Literacy and COVID-19 : elementary students' reading performance through a global pandemic
2022
- 36Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage36
- Downloads26
- Abstract Views10
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The critical area of literacy instruction has long relied on the use of measurement tools and the resulting data to identify at-risk readers and deliver needed supports. When the COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption to education, measurement practices were altered and there was limited existing research available to predict the potential impact of the pandemic on literacy development. The primary purpose of this study was to examine the reading performance of students in a Southern Tier New York elementary school before and during the pandemic, utilizing existing data from fall 2019 to spring 2021. Additionally, this study sought to evaluate the use of Fountas and Pinnell’s Benchmark Assessment System (BAS) as a measurement tool to assess reading skills. Older elementary students were found to present with reading scores increasingly below expected benchmarks after the onset of the pandemic. Students who were considered at-risk readers prior to the pandemic read below expected benchmarks throughout the pandemic, unlike students who met or exceeded expectations prior to the pandemic. Fluency scores measured with the BAS produced inconsistent results, indicating that Fountas and Pinnell’s fluency scores should not be used to screen for risk status. Though specific to the studied elementary school, these findings add to the emerging literature on the COVID-19 pandemic and literacy performance. Conclusions specific to the studied school and recommendations for future directions are provided.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know