The Equity E.O.: Building a Regulatory Infrastructure of Inclusion
Admin. & Reg. L. News, Vol: 46, Issue: 3, Page: 5
2021
- 44Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage44
- Downloads24
- Abstract Views20
Article Description
Among his first acts, President Biden signed Executive Order 13,985 to advance “Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government.” Alongside an order directing regulatory review to include “social welfare, racial justice, environmental stewardship, human dignity, equity, and the interests of future generations” and an ambitious infrastructure plan, this Equity E.O. signals a new engagement of the administrative state in proactively promoting racial equity and other dimensions of inclusion. The outlines of the infrastructure initiative are still emerging, but what appears key is its conceptualization of infrastructure as extending beyond roads and buildings to the social and human capital — including technological access and caregiving — that enables connection to opportunity and full thriving for all Americans. Crucially, the proposed infrastructure plan also directs investments into communities that were intentionally excluded from or harmed by federal government programs, for instance, communities cut off from economic opportunity by the construction of federally-funded highways or redlined out of federally backed housing loan programs. The Equity E.O. may seem technocratic in comparison, as it is big on process and short on concrete initiatives and new money, but, alongside the other initiatives, it has potential to prompt serious examination of the role of the administrative state in the formation and maintenance of racial and other forms of inequality and to lead to creative rethinking of the structure and design of federal programs across a range of domains.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know