Guest Editorial: Future Directions for Issues Management
Corporate Reputation Review, ISSN: 1479-1889, Vol: 6, Issue: 1, Page: 7-18
2003
- 18Citations
- 1Usage
- 31Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- CrossRef18
- 16
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Issues management as a corporate activity lies at the heart of reputation management, public affairs, and corporate communication. Yet its dual position as a professional field and a topic of scientific study is highly fragile. From the practitioner side, the legitimacy of issues management is under constant attack by both stakeholder groups and skeptic public affairs officials. From the academic side, the community of researchers with an interest in issues management is frighteningly small and widely dispersed over business and journalism schools on several continents. To make the case for the preservation of issues management as a significant managerial task, this paper proposes three future directions for research and practice: (1) infusing orthodox issues life cycle research with theories from other social sciences; (2) seeking cross-fertilization with research in the stakeholder management tradition; and (3) integrating issues management research more strongly with the burgeoning literature on the management of corporate reputation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33751080871&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540186; http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540186; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540186; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540186.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540186/fulltext.html; https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/3268; https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4269&context=facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540186; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540186
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know