A Standardized Method for Evaluating the Image in Fluorescence Microscopy
Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, Vol: 64, Issue: 1, Page: 132-138
1957
- 53Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage53
- Downloads47
- Abstract Views6
Artifact Description
The problem of evaluating the virtual image in fluorescence microscopy is essentially one of assaying the several attributes of color, viz. hue, value, and chroma or saturation. DeMent (1942) suggested that fluorescence phenomena be reported according to the recommendations on color of the American Optical Society. This is a qualitative estimate employing some twenty-one hue names qualified by eight adjectives. The present work has been designed to delimit these adjectives and to provide a common denominator for the concept of hue. The concept of hue varies not only with an individual's inherited ability to perceive color, but also with the extent of his training in the observation of color. Many people are not color blind, but are color ignorant, which is to say that their ideas of color are not the same as those of the person who classifies them as color ignorant. What is bright or dull, or light or dark, to one person is not necessarily the same to another. What is pink, or orange, or blue to one person may not be the same to another, at least not to the same degree. Consequently, there is a multiplicity of terms in the nomenclature of color. Because of this it is desirable to employ a color standard which takes these variations into account and to adapt its use to the problem at hand.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know