Food Systems Futures Part 2: Hosting your own scenario workshop + Using the Recipe for a scenario method
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Building on activities from Part 1, this session discussed the practicalities of running a scenario workshop, detailed the scenario building process, and explored the rationale for the component parts. The session opened with a recap of the scenario workshop, which is defined as a place where the community and researchers work together to co-create scenarios for the future. Wentworth discussed how to develop a feasible vision, obtain relevant participants, and outlined how to structure the workshop. The vision should be built on some existing work or research co-generated with community partners. Workshop coordinators should aim to find a diverse group of participants that are representative of stakeholders within the specific food system at play, and how to advertise and invite participants, as well as logistics like feeding participants and finding a space that will comfortably fit them. Wentworth emphasized the role of co-facilitators, obtaining IRB approval and participant consent, developing community norms for interacting in space, creating a timeline for the workshop day. Participants were led through an exercise in short- and long-term priorities to brainstorm feasible outcomes participants would need to see over a period of 0-10 years and 10-20 years to work toward their goal. The session closed by giving participants the opportunity to network with each other and make plans for continued collaboration.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know