Estuarine Blue Infrastructure: Final Priority Conservation Areas for Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal Tributaries and Back Bay – Version 2.0 (Revised 09/2010)
2010
- 58Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage58
- Downloads51
- Abstract Views7
Report Description
This project is an extension of earlier efforts within the coastal zone of Virginia to build a platform for enhanced Blue and Green Infrastructure planning. This project is motivated by an interest in extending statewide conservation efforts into estuarine systems and recognition that land use decisions on the upland effect water quality and habitat health in the receiving waters. The project in its entirety has been accomplished in distinct parts. Part one develops a Cumulative Resource Assessment to evaluate the distribution of aquatic natural resources within waters of Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay waters, Back Bay of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and the seaside of the Eastern Shore of Virginia. This task mined data resources at all levels of government to bring together a comprehensive representation of information available for the study areas. The outcome of the CRA would indicate where the maximum number of resources co-exists, but not necessarily where the most important resources exist. The second part of the project develops a process to prioritize the most ecologically valuable regions within Virginia tidal waters. Using the data output from the CRA, an Aquatic Priority Conservation Area (APCA) analysis was developed which ranks individual resources based on potential to provide important ecosystem services. A weighting function was applied and zones of good, very high, and exceptional habitat value were designated. Phase three of the project reviewed priority conservation areas (PCAs) designated on the upland and modeled spatial relationships between terrestrial PCAs and Aquatic PCAs. Linkages established between the two could potentially elevate areas on the upland for conservation due to the geo-spatial relationship to important aquatic areas. The analysis only focused on the highest valued conservation areas within both datasets. Finally where data was available and could support an analysis of climate change impacts, the APCA output was assessed for areas vulnerable to sea level rise impacts. The results of the analysis, which focused only within the Chesapeake Bay portion of Virginia, could indicate where APCA were unlikely to be sustained as a result of long-term impacts of rising water levels. The analysis used climate change vulnerability data derived for wetlands and beach environments as the indicator and identified APCAs adjacent to or coincident with these locations.
Bibliographic Details
10.21220/m2-x7ay-ej54; 10.21220/m2-7m7q-1b86; 10.21220/m2-s8y9-nj39; 10.21220/m2-c1pp-5012; 10.21220/m2-2gdc-rd20; 10.21220/m2-e6t4-rv94; 10.21220/m2-ntr7-jm70; 10.21220/m2-3w0f-jw26; 10.21220/m2-beay-a452; 10.21220/m2-dvdh-4n04; 10.21220/m2-mzec-wa22; 10.21220/m2-2vbg-5h05; 10.21220/m2-007e-9v76; 10.21220/m2-q2dv-0d78; 10.21220/m2-p2nf-v283; 10.21220/m2-tsw3-yx94; 10.21220/m2-1pnf-m663; 10.21220/m2-vj3c-tr48; 10.21220/m2-x4ha-9a59; 10.21220/m2-eck2-kc69; 10.21220/m2-r3yq-x633; 10.21220/m2-7t18-7h35; 10.21220/m2-x420-sz46; 10.21220/m2-q31s-ve51; 10.21220/m2-zftr-kv87; 10.21220/m2-g3xb-kg89; 10.21220/m2-sbgf-7w56; 10.21220/m2-k8q9-pt87; 10.21220/m2-7r0g-y250; 10.21220/m2-3mq9-4y36; 10.21220/m2-t0ty-nt39; 10.21220/m2-dyny-5s11; 10.21220/m2-93ph-mm44; 10.21220/m2-1r30-ms70; 10.21220/m2-b5d9-bx18; 10.21220/m2-g3b6-cz69; 10.21220/m2-5csm-kw91; 10.21220/m2-jptd-3t03; 10.21220/m2-txy3-s309; 10.21220/m2-f4hc-s279; 10.21220/m2-wch0-j113; 10.21220/m2-hb12-zc18; 10.21220/m2-snsj-7348; 10.21220/m2-05dd-4w76; 10.21220/m2-h26j-q214; 10.21220/m2-hmsh-wd74; 10.21220/m2-6rm9-d889; 10.21220/m2-jwnr-yy89; 10.21220/m2-4h7q-3k03
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports/516; https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1516&context=reports; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-x7ay-ej54; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-7m7q-1b86; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-s8y9-nj39; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-c1pp-5012; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-2gdc-rd20; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-e6t4-rv94; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-ntr7-jm70; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-3w0f-jw26; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-beay-a452; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-dvdh-4n04; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-mzec-wa22; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-2vbg-5h05; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-007e-9v76; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-q2dv-0d78; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-p2nf-v283; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-tsw3-yx94; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-1pnf-m663; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-vj3c-tr48; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-x4ha-9a59; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-eck2-kc69; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-r3yq-x633; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-7t18-7h35; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-x420-sz46; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-q31s-ve51; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-zftr-kv87; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-g3xb-kg89; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-sbgf-7w56; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-k8q9-pt87; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-7r0g-y250; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-3mq9-4y36; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-t0ty-nt39; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-dyny-5s11; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-93ph-mm44; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-1r30-ms70; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-b5d9-bx18; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-x7ay-ej54; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-g3b6-cz69; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-5csm-kw91; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-jptd-3t03; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-txy3-s309; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-f4hc-s279; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-wch0-j113; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-hb12-zc18; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-snsj-7348; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-05dd-4w76; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-h26j-q214; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-hmsh-wd74; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-6rm9-d889; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-jwnr-yy89; https://doi.org/10.21220%2Fm2-4h7q-3k03; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-3w0f-jw26; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-3w0f-jw26; https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports/516/; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-q2dv-0d78; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-q2dv-0d78; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-e6t4-rv94; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-e6t4-rv94; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-2gdc-rd20; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-2gdc-rd20; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-6rm9-d889; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-6rm9-d889; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-f4hc-s279; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-f4hc-s279; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-jwnr-yy89; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-jwnr-yy89; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-q31s-ve51; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-q31s-ve51; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-3mq9-4y36; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-3mq9-4y36; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-7t18-7h35; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-7t18-7h35; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-eck2-kc69; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-eck2-kc69; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-h26j-q214; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-h26j-q214; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-93ph-mm44; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-93ph-mm44; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-g3xb-kg89; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-g3xb-kg89; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-ntr7-jm70; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-ntr7-jm70; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-mzec-wa22; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-mzec-wa22; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-jptd-3t03; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-jptd-3t03; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-dyny-5s11; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-dyny-5s11; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-g3b6-cz69; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-g3b6-cz69; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-tsw3-yx94; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-tsw3-yx94; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-vj3c-tr48; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-vj3c-tr48; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-beay-a452; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-beay-a452; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-snsj-7348; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-snsj-7348; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-hb12-zc18; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-hb12-zc18; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-c1pp-5012; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-c1pp-5012; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-4h7q-3k03; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-4h7q-3k03; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-1r30-ms70; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-1r30-ms70; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-x420-sz46; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-x420-sz46; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-hmsh-wd74; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-hmsh-wd74; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-x4ha-9a59; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-x4ha-9a59; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-txy3-s309; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-txy3-s309; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-007e-9v76; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-007e-9v76; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-5csm-kw91; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-5csm-kw91; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-r3yq-x633; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-r3yq-x633; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-p2nf-v283; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-p2nf-v283; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-sbgf-7w56; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-sbgf-7w56; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-7r0g-y250; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-7r0g-y250; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-7m7q-1b86; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-7m7q-1b86; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-b5d9-bx18; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-b5d9-bx18; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-zftr-kv87; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-zftr-kv87; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-t0ty-nt39; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-t0ty-nt39; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-dvdh-4n04; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-dvdh-4n04; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-2vbg-5h05; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-2vbg-5h05; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-1pnf-m663; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-1pnf-m663; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-k8q9-pt87; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-k8q9-pt87; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-s8y9-nj39; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-s8y9-nj39; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-05dd-4w76; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-05dd-4w76; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-x7ay-ej54; http://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-wch0-j113; https://dx.doi.org/10.21220/m2-wch0-j113
William & Mary School of Arts & Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know