Validation of accelerometer for measuring physical activity in free-living individuals
Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, Vol: 10, Issue: 1, Page: 7-21
2022
- 4Citations
- 591Usage
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Usage591
- Downloads539
- Abstract Views52
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
Background: The aim of this research was to validate a triaxial GT3X accelerometer against doubly labelled water for measuring total energy expenditure (TEE) in a study of free-living Dutch adults and to compare the two prediction equations used to calculate accelerometer derived activity related energy expenditure. Material/Methods: We used a measurement error model to estimate bias in the mean TEE, a correlation coefficient between measured and true TEE (a validity coefficient, which quantifies loss of statistical power to detect association) and the attenuation factor (which quantifies bias in the association), with and without conditioning on age, sex and BMI. We proposed a calibration method for the accelerometer-based TEE. Results: The accelerometer underestimated TEE by about 500kcal/day. The validity coefficient estimate conditional on age, sex and BMI was 0.8; the same value was observed for the attenuation factor estimate. With the devised calibration method, the bias in accelerometer derived mean TEE reduced to 6 kcal/day, validity coefficient estimate increased to 0.95 and attenuation factor to 0.94. Conclusions: The GT3X accelerometer would underestimate mean TEE, lead to minimal loss in statistical power to detect significant association, and would result in biased estimate of the association between TEE and a health outcome.
Bibliographic Details
https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/journal/vol10/iss1/1; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol10/iss1/1
https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol10/iss1/1/; http://dx.doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.10.1.01; https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/journal/vol10/iss1/1; https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1570&context=journal; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol10/iss1/1; https://www.balticsportscience.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1570&context=journal; https://dx.doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.10.1.01
Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know