The quality of life, neck and shoulder area dysfunction and upper body posture among people with and without moderate myopia
Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, ISSN: 2080-9999, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 29-36
2021
- 605Usage
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage605
- Downloads458
- Abstract Views147
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 24
Article Description
Background: Material and methods: Results: Conclusions: The current study aimed to examine the quality of life, dysfunction in the neck area and upper body posture among people with moderate myopia and to analyse the relationship between myopia and upper body posture. Participants were 11 people with moderate myopia (MG) and 11 people without myopia (CG). The general quality of life was evaluated with the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), neck area pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and discomfort with the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ). The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ25) was used to measure vision-targeted health. Upper body was evaluated with the New York Posture Rating Chart. Correlation analysis examined the relationship between head position and vision. The general quality of life and upper body posture characteristics did not differ significantly in MG as compared to CG. A significant difference in NBQ (p < 0.05), NEI-VFQ25 (p < 0.05) and VAS (p < 0.01) was established between MG and CG. A significant relationship (r=-.691) between increasing severity of myopia and head position was found. The study findings highlight the complaints of people with moderate myopia compared to people without myopia concerning both their quality of life and musculoskeletal problems.
Bibliographic Details
https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/journal/vol13/iss1/4; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol13/iss1/4
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147873300&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.13.1.04; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol13/iss1/4/; https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/journal/vol13/iss1/4; https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=journal; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol13/iss1/4; https://www.balticsportscience.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=journal; https://dx.doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.13.1.04
Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know